Disability Discrimination

The Americans with Disability Act and state laws prohibit workplace disability discrimination. Employers must provide equal opportunities and reasonable accommodations to individuals with disabilities.

According to the US Census Bureau, in 2014 about 27.2 percent, or 85.3 million, of people living in the United States had a disability and about 17.6 percent, or 55.2 million people, had a severe disability. Despite these high numbers, the US Census Bureau stated that disability prevalence may be undercounted. 

It is notoriously difficult for individuals with disabilities to get and maintain employment.  As the chart below shows, 59.8 percent of adults with a severe disability remained without employment for all 12 months compared with 27.9 percent of adults with non-severe disabilities and 18.8 percent with no disabilities.

And disabled individuals earn less than non-disabled individuals when they do work: $27,080/year compared with $35,915/year for adults with no disability.

In 1990, the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) was enacted in response to congressional findings highlighting “the continuing existence of unfair and unnecessary discrimination and prejudice [that] denies people with disabilities the opportunity to compete on an equal basis.” 42 U.S.C. §12101(a)(8).  In 2008, Congress passed the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (ADAAA) to invalidate decisions that had narrowed the definition of disability.  Congress stated that the ADAAA was passed to “restore the intent and protections of the Americans with Disabilities Act.” Pub. L. No. 110-325, 122 Stat. 3553. In passing the ADAAA, Congress reasserted its goal of “provid[ing] clear, strong, consistent, enforceable standards” to implement a “comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities.” 42 U.S.C. §12101(b)(1), (2). Despite these laws “unfair and unnecessary” disability discrimination continues to this day.

Are you the victim of disability discrimination, harassment, or retaliation?  Premier Litigators handles high-value, high-impact disability discrimination, harassment, and retaliation matters (AKA “wrongful termination”) in California, Florida, Michigan, Georgia, and Illinois.  For a free consultation with one of our attorneys about your disability discrimination case, contact us at (877) 858-6868 or coordinator@caklegal.com.

Disability Discrimination Attorneys
Disability Discrimination Attorneys

WHY HIRE CANTRELL ASTBURY KRANZ, P.A.

The four most important characteristics in any disability discrimination, harassment, or retaliation attorney are:

  1. Educational background: Premier Litigators’ attorneys graduated from a top law school or at the very top of their law school class. Cantrell Astbury Kranz, P.A. Chief Trial Counsel for all wrongful termination cases, Warren Astbury, graduated from Harvard Law School in 2009. 
  2. Subject matter expertise:  The attorneys in our employment law practice have dedicated most of their careers to handling employment discrimination, harassment, and retaliation cases. This has led to the development of a broad and deep knowledge of disability discrimination, harassment, and retaliation law and the factors necessary to win these cases. In short, Cantrell Astbury Kranz, P.A. has the skill, experience, and expertise required to help you achieve the best possible outcome in your disability discrimination case.
  3. Past results:  Cantrell Astbury Kranz, P.A. attorneys have a proven track record of high-value results.
    • Successfully obtained a mid-six-figure settlement in single-plaintiff disability discrimination, harassment, and retaliation case against a hospital in Louisville, Kentucky where an employee was terminated because she missed too many days while receiving cancer treatment.
    • Successfully obtained a high-six-figure settlement in a single-plaintiff race discrimination, harassment, and retaliation case in Los Angeles, California involving an employee who was threatened with a noose in a case that was covered by national media.
    • Successfully obtained a mid-six-figure settlement in a single-plaintiff sexual harassment and retaliation case in Detroit, Michigan where the female employee was shown graphic pictures by a male co-worker and was forced to resign by her employer after she complained to management.
    • Successfully obtained a mid-six-figure settlement in a single-plaintiff race discrimination, harassment, and retaliation case in Lansing, Michigan against one of the state’s largest employers where the employer forced the employee to resign after he complained about race discrimination.
    • Successfully obtained a six-figure settlement in single-plaintiff race discrimination, harassment, and retaliation case in Los Angeles, California involving an employee who was forced to resign after he reported seeing a noose to his employer.

    We cannot promise similar results in your matter, but we can promise that your case will be handled with the same focus and dedication that led to these high-value results.   

  4. Trial Experience:  If your disability discrimination attorney has a reputation for always settling, why would the other side ever make a fair settlement offer?  After all, they know your attorney will accept their unfair offer to settle eventually.   Ask any disability discrimination attorney you are considering about their prior trial experience.  You’ll be surprised how many have rarely, if ever, tried a case before. Can you trust your case to somebody who’s still learning how to try a case?

    To get fair value for your case, your attorney must be ready, willing, and able to go to trial.  At Cantrell Astbury Kranz, P.A., we prepare your case for trial from the day we are hired.  We gather as much evidence as possible and interview critical witnesses before filing your case.  That way, we are prepared to try your case before your former employer even knows it exists and can negotiate from a position of strength, not weakness. 

    At Cantrell Astbury Kranz, P.A., our Chief Trial Counsel, Warren Astbury, has tried over 20 jury trials in his career and about 30 more bench trials (cases tried before a Judge only). That’s the Cantrell Astbury Kranz, P.A. advantage: We’re ready to go to trial from day one and have the skills to present your case in the best possible light when it gets to trial.

Are you the victim of disability discrimination, harassment, or retaliation?  Cantrell Astbury Kranz, P.A. handles high-value, high-impact disability discrimination, harassment, and retaliation matters (AKA “wrongful termination”) in California, Florida, Michigan, Georgia, and Illinois.  For a free consultation with one of our attorneys about your disability discrimination case, contact us at (877) 858-6868 or coordinator@caklegal.com.

EMPLOYMENT LAW DISPUTES WE HANDLE

Cantrell Astbury Kranz, P.A. handles disability discrimination cases under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (Title VII), California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Michigan’s Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act, the Florida Civil Rights Act, Georgia’s Fair Employment Practices Act, and the Illinois Human Rights Act.  

Are you the victim of disability discrimination, harassment, or retaliation?  Cantrell Astbury Kranz, P.A.  handles high-value, high-impact disability discrimination, harassment, and retaliation matters (AKA “wrongful termination”) in California, Florida, Michigan, Georgia, and Illinois.  

For a free consultation with one of our attorneys about your disability discrimination case, contact us at (877) 858-6868 or coordinator@caklegal.com.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Private employers, employment agencies, and labor unions with 15 or more employees are covered by the ADA (also referred to as the ADAAA, with the additional AA standing for “as amended”).  Additionally, State and local governments of any size are covered by the ADA.

Under California’s Fair Employment Housing Act (FEHA), private employers with five or more employees are covered. 

Under Florida’s Civil Rights Act (FCRA), private employers with 15 or more employees in 20 or more calendar weeks in the current or preceding calendar year are covered. 

Under Georgia’s Fair Employment Practices Act, any Georgia state agency and any private employer with 10 or more employees cannot discriminate against any individual on the basis of disability.

Under Michigan’s Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act (PDCRA), private employers of any size are covered.

The ADA defines an “individual with a disability” as a person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, has a record of such an impairment, or is regarded as having such an impairment.

Major life activities” specifically include: 

  • Seeing
  • Hearing 
  • Speaking
  • Walking 
  • Breathing
  • Performing manual tasks
  • Learning
  • Caring for oneself, and 
  • Working. 

The second part of the definition would include, for example, a person with a history of cancer that is currently in remission or a person with a history of mental illness.

The third part of the definition protects individuals who are regarded and treated as though they have a substantially limiting disability, even though they may not have such an impairment. For example, this provision would protect a severely disfigured qualified individual from being denied employment because an employer feared the “negative reactions” of others.

Almost all state laws have a similar definition.

While there is no specific time-duration requirement to meet the “disability” definition, generally, an individual with a minor, nonchronic condition of short duration, such as a sprain, infection, or broken limb, generally would not be covered. 

One common misconception is that disabilities lasting less than 6 months automatically fall outside of the “disability” definition.  This is false. While the ADAAA excludes transitory (lasting less than six months) and minor impairments from the “regarded as” avenue of coverage (employers who regard an employee as disabled even though they are not), neither the ADAAA nor the final regulations apply this exception to the other two definitions of disability. One of the “rules of construction” states that the effects of an impairment lasting less than six months can be substantially limiting. Title 29, Part 1630.2(j)(1)(ix) 

A qualified individual with a disability is a person who: 

  • Meets legitimate skill, experience, education, or other requirements of an employment position that he or she holds or seeks; and 
  • Who can perform the “essential functions” of the position with or without reasonable accommodation. 

If the individual’s disability makes them unable to perform the “essential functions” of the position, the employer must consider whether the individual could perform these functions with a reasonable accommodation. 

The best evidence of the “essential functions” of the job is a written job description prepared before advertising or interviewing applicants for a job.  Obviously, the job description is written after the employee’s disability is known, it will be looked upon more skeptically by the court and a jury.

No, unless they can cite a “direct threat” caused by your disability, see FAQ 6 below. Both state and federal disability discrimination statutes prohibit your employer from discriminating against an employee because of their disability when making decisions regarding: 

  • Hiring
  • Firing 
  • Layoffs
  • Tenure 
  • Promotions
  • Leave 
  • Compensation 
  • Fringe benefits 
  • Training, 
  • And all other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment. 

If you believe you are the victim of disability discrimination, you should make a formal complaint to your employer in writing (e.g. an email cc’ing HR and your supervisors), AND file a charge of discrimination with both your state civil rights agency and the EEOC immediately.  

Yes. The ADA expressly permits employers to establish qualification standards that will exclude individuals who pose a “direct threat”—a significant risk of substantial harm—to the health or safety of the individual or of others, if that risk cannot be lowered to an acceptable level by reasonable accommodation. 

Crucially, your employer may not simply assume that a threat exists; your employer must establish through objective, medically supportable methods that there is a genuine risk that substantial harm could occur in the workplace. This requirement prevents your employer from acting on generalizations, ignorance, fear, patronizing attitudes, or stereotypes, the ADA recognizes the need to balance the interests of people with disabilities against the legitimate interests of employers in maintaining a safe workplace.

No, so long as the decision not to hire or promote you is unrelated to your disability.  

No. The ADA prohibits discrimination based on a relationship or association with a disabled individual. Often this form of discrimination is based on an unfounded assumption that the employee’s relationship with a person with a disability will affect their job performance (e.g. they will need to take more leave or will be distracted from work assignments). 

The ADA defines a “reasonable accommodation” as a modification or adjustment to a job or the work environment that will enable a qualified applicant or employee with a disability to participate in the application process or perform essential job functions.

The ADA requires reasonable accommodations as they relate to three aspects of employment: 1) ensuring equal opportunity in the application process; 2) enabling a qualified individual with a disability to perform the essential functions of a job; and 3) making it possible for an employee with a disability to enjoy equal benefits and privileges of employment. 

Common examples of reasonable accommodations include:

  • Making existing facilities used by employees readily accessible to and usable by an individual with a disability
  • Restructuring a job
  • Modifying work schedules
  • Providing additional leave
  • Reassignment to a vacant position for which the individual is qualified
  • Acquiring or modifying equipment

A fantastic resource for reasonable accommodation requests is the Job Accommodation Network (JAN). 

Yes, assuming it does not create an undue burden (e.g. excessive cost).  An employer may be required to modify facilities to enable an individual to perform the essential functions of their job and to allow individuals with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in all employment-related activities. For example, if an employee break area is inaccessible to a person using a wheelchair, the break area might need to be modified, relocated, or a comparable break area might need to be provided in an area that would permit the disabled individual to take a break with co-workers.

Yes. An employer is required to accommodate only “known” disabilities.  Generally, if you do not request an accommodation, your employer is not obligated to provide you with one. If a disabled employee requests a reasonable accommodation, but cannot suggest a specific accommodation, the employee and their employer must work together to identify a reasonable accommodation. This is called the “interactive process.”  

The “interactive process” involves four steps to be completed jointly by the disabled employee and their employer:

(1) Analyzing the position held by the disabled employee to determine its purpose and essential functions;

(2) Consulting with the disabled employee to determine the exact job-related limitations caused by their disability and how those limitations can be overcome with a reasonable accommodation;

(3) Identifying potential accommodations and assessing how effective each accommodation would be in enabling the employee to perform the essential functions of their position; and

(4) Considering disabled employee’s preferences when selecting and implementing the accommodation.  

Yes. First, you must (1) have a qualifying disability, (2) be qualified for the position, and (3) your disability must be known to the employer. Assuming you meet all three preconditions, your employer is still not required to make an accommodation if it would impose an “undue hardship” on the business. “Undue hardship” is defined as “an action requiring significant difficulty or expense” when considered in light of several factors. 

These factors include the nature and cost of the accommodation in relation to the (1) size, (2) resources, (3) nature, and (4) structure of the employer’s operation. When your employer is part of a larger entity,  the structure and overall resources of the larger organization will be considered, as well as the financial and administrative relationship of the facility to the larger organization. Generally, the larger your employer the tougher it will be to show that the requested accommodation is an “undue burden.” 

Are you the victim of disability discrimination, harassment, or retaliation?  Premier Litigators handles high-value, high-impact disability discrimination, harassment, and retaliation matters (AKA “wrongful termination”) in California, Florida, Michigan, Georgia, and Illinois.  For a free consultation with one of our attorneys about your disability discrimination case, contact us at (877) 858-6868 or coordinator@caklegal.com.

About

Litigation Practice

MESSAGE US

Message Us
Name
Short description 500 characters or less.

WHAT OUR CLIENTS SAY ABOUT US